North Houston Chapter, Act! For America

...before it's too late.

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Welcome to the North Houston Chapter of Act! For America

Blow Back Theory

E-mail Print PDF

The article below was written by one of our concerned members.  Thought you would be interested in reading his viewpoint because he has done his research.

********************************************************************************************************************

 The biggest problem that many people have with Paul’s views is that he does not know how to defend a nation. His “blow-back theory,” i.e. Muslims attack us because of our presence in “Arab lands” is so ludicrous that it makes me want to climb the walls!  He is blind to the fact that Muslim pirates presented this nation with its first crisis during George Washington’s presidency. It happened at a time when we had no choice but to have an isolationist policy because we had no navy or standing army. After the war for independence from Britain, the members of our volunteer army went back home, hung their muskets over the fireplace, and continued their domestic life of farming and raising of families. We needed to develop our economy and were attempting to establish foreign trade. Unarmed U.S. merchant ships enroute to ports around the world were being pirated, their crews captured, enslaved, tortured or killed. The first four U.S. Presidents (Washington, Adams, Jefferson and Madison) found themselves having to negotiate and very grudgingly made payments that ranged between 16% - 22% of America’s revenues as “tribute” to these international predators….until we had time to build a navy to protect ourselves. When President George Washington sent John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to Britain to negotiate with the Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the Dey of Algiers, an Islamist warlord ruling Algeria, who was also the ambassador to Britain, they asked him to explain why Muslims held such hostility to America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts? His reply was that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

 

Ron Paul’s claim that U.S. presence in so-called “Arab lands” has caused their hostility toward us is totally bogus. He prescribes “isolationism” as the solution. It would be the height of folly to remove our military presence from strategically important foreign outposts. It is precisely because our military stands guard in foreign lands that the economic and political interests of our nation have been protected. While it is true that we should not be the world’s policemen, and that our political leaders have sent our military on missions not relevant to our nation’s best interests; nevertheless, the U.S. Military should have presence in or near where our citizens travel as tourists or to conduct business in any nation deemed by our state department as friendly to the United States. Furthermore, when foreign governments fail to protect our citizens, they should be held accountable by force of arms if necessary.

 

It seems that we have come full circle. Islam is again rearing its ugly head. Muslims are causing trouble everywhere they reside. Once again, Islam is proving to be a virulent, aggressive international Mafia/criminal organization with a religious front. Muslims continue the tradition of subverting the laws, customs and culture of the host nations where they immigrate. Mohammad began and his followers continue the practice of plundering the wealth of nations. All Muslims are incorrigible members of the most brutal totalitarian organization the world has ever seen. They are responsible for the deaths of over 270 million human beings over their 1,400 year history. Their march across North Africa and southern Europe and eastward to the border of China was an unprovoked assault. Muslims like to point their fingers at the Christian Crusades as being a brutal attack on Muslims, but they fail to disclose that the 1st Crusade didn’t occur until 300 years after Islam’s rape, pillage, enslavement, displacement and/or massacre of the innocent victims in the peaceful nations that it invaded. Mohammad was its Godfather who raised his army by assuaging the guilty consciences of his recruits by legitimizing the basest lust patterns of man’s corrupt nature. He convinced his followers that Allah (Mohammad’s invented god, the chief idol of the Arabs for hundreds of years prior to him) had sanctioned these practices. Furthermore, who could or would dare argue with Allah’s sole representative? He rewarded their victories with the spoils of war, but the sword was ever present to punish those who defied him or renounced the faith. Muslims have a 1,400 year history as international aggressors. They are all citizen-soldiers of a system that is parasitic in nature. Islam began and continues to plunder nations which have made themselves vulnerable because of their lack of military preparedness, and moral decay.  

 

If we survive nationally, it will be because we are the best equipped, best trained military establishment in the world and our troops are lead by type-A personality military leaders who have wisdom, self-control and who are backed up by honorable statesmen in the halls of Congress, and a President who does not dissimulate, and who lets it be known that America will not tolerate abuse of its citizens or its representatives anywhere in the world. Great leaders possess both moral courage and battle courage. America does not want a leader who would have us cower in the corner. Isolationism can be legitimately used as a tactic to regroup forces for a counter attack, but Ron Paul would have us believe that it will appease our enemies. He is a phlegmatic (peace at any price type personality) who might be ok as Treasury Secretary, but certainly not as President. One Jimmy Carter was enough!

 

Mosques are command and control centers for subversion. Muslims planners are using the 1st amendment (religious freedom) to hijack article 6 (the Supremacy Clause) and replace our Constitution with Sharia law. Islam and ALL of its practitioners are the enemies of all nations. The non-violent ones are “snakes in the egg” waiting for the right climate to hatch out and start biting, injecting the poisonous venom of Islamic law into our Judeo-Christian culture. They are deft practitioners of mind control, portraying Islam as a religion of peace. They have deceived our leaders into placing their operatives in our most sensitive security agencies. Our national security is riddled with domestic and foreign enemies. 

 

Jefferson's victory over the Muslims lives on today in the Marine Hymn, with the line, "From the halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli, We fight our country's battles in the air, on land and sea." It was to the shores of Tripoli (Libya) that our Marines had to go in order to protect our citizens and their possessions abroad. Seven U.S. warships saw action in the battle to stop Muslim aggression. It took an overwhelming military victory to cause the Muslims to abandon slavery and piracy of our ships. Let us not forget that it was the vigor of our industrial-military complex that enabled us to defend ourselves, a concept that Paul scorns. It is the vigilance and sacrifices of our brave soldiers who guard the gates, plus the grace of God that delivers us and keeps us free.

 

Islamic Indoctrination in Textbooks

E-mail Print PDF

Islamic Indoctrination in Textbooks

By Phyllis Schlafly

….An organization called ACT for America conducted an analysis of 38 textbooks used in the sixth- through 12th-grades in public schools, and found that since the 1990s, discussions of Islam are taking up more and more pages, while the space devoted to Judaism and Christianity has simultaneously decreased. In 2011, the National Assessment of Educational Progress reported that American 12th graders scored lower in history than in any other subject, even lower than in science, math and economics.

Most of these students are too young to remember 9/11, so current textbook descriptions about 9/11 is all they will learn. In one textbook example of pro-Islamic revisionism, 9/11 is portrayed as “a horrible act of terrorism, or violence to further a cause,” without any mention that the attackers were Muslims or that the “cause” was Islamic jihad.

The textbooks generally give a false description of women’s rights under Islam. The books don’t reveal that women are subject to polygamy, a husband’s legal right to beat her, genital mutilation, and the scandalous practice misnamed “honor killings,” which allows a man to murder a daughter who dares to date a Christian.

Slavery is usually a favorite topic for the liberals, but historical revisionism is particularly evident in the failure to mention the Islamic slave trade. It began nearly eight centuries before the European-operated Atlantic slave trade and continues in some Muslim areas even today.

Other examples of historical revisionism in currently used textbooks include the omission of the doctrine of jihad or failure to accurately define it. Discussions of Muhammad’s life and character are often contrary to accepted historical facts.

Muslim conquests and imperialism are usually omitted or downplayed, and a completely false narrative about the Crusades is given. The books often falsely claim that Islam is tolerant of Jews and Christians.

Another technique is to describe Christian and Jewish religious traditions as mere stories attributable to some human source, whereas Islamic traditions are presented as indisputable historic facts. In one textbook, you can read that Moses “claimed” to receive the Ten Commandments from God but that Muhammad simply “received” the Koran from God.

ACT for America is sending its report to all U.S. school board members nationwide. We hope they read it and tell the publishers the schools won’t buy books that contain such errors and biases because that may be parents’ only remedy for this indoctrination.

In the year of 9/11, a big controversy erupted at Excelsior public school in Byron, Calif., where seventh graders were being taught a three-week course about the Islamic religion. This course required the kids to learn 25 Islamic terms, 20 proverbs, Islam’s Five Pillars of Faith, 10 key Islamic prophets and disciples, recite from the Koran, wear a robe during class, adopt a Muslim name, and stage their own “holy war” in a dice game.

Excelsior was using one of the textbooks that omit information about Islam’s wars, massacres, and cruelties against Christians and Jews. Christianity was mentioned only briefly and negatively, linked to the Inquisition and to Salem witch hunts.

The students were given Muslim names and told to recite Muslim prayers in class. They were required to give up things for a day to recognize the Islamic practice of Ramadan, and the teacher gave extra credit for fasting at lunch.

For the final exam, the students had to write an essay about Islamic culture. The essay assignment warned students in these words: “Be careful here; if you do not have something positive to say, don’t say anything!!!”

Parents naively thought they could appeal to the courts to uphold their right to reject this class for their children, which was really not education but behavior modification. They didn’t realize that federal court decisions have ruled consistently against parents’ rights and in favor of the authority of public schools to teach whatever they want.

The parents lost in court. And on Oct. 2, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider the parents’ appeal from the lower court decision against them.

 

The New Nazis

E-mail Print PDF

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2012/03/new-nazis.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews+%28from+NY+to+Israel+Sultan+Reveals+The+Stories+Behind+the+News%29

 

The New Nazis

There was a time in France when Jewish children were hunted down and killed. Their killers believed themselves to be members of a superior group that was destined to rule the world and enslave or exterminate members of inferior groups. The cowardice and appeasement of the French authorities allowed them to operate freely, to kill Jews and launch attacks on other countries.

 

What was then is now again. The occupying army doesn't wear uniforms, it wears keffiyahs. It doesn't speak German, it speaks Arabic. It doesn't believe that it is superior for reasons of race as much as for reasons of religion. It does not view all others as Untermenschen, but as infidels. It looks forward not to a thousand year Reich, but to a thousand year Caliphate.

Mohammed Merah did not chase down a French-Jewish seven-year-old girl, put a gun to her head, and pull the trigger because he came from an economically depressed area or any of the other media spin. He was only doing what Muslims had been doing to non-Muslims for over a thousand years. He didn't do what he did because he was "radicalized," he did it because he became a fully committed Muslim.

It won't end with taking down one man and it won't end with Jewish children. When your ideology believes that it is in a zero-sum struggle with the rest of the world and that membership means that you are a superior breed of human being because you worship the Fuhrer or Allah, then it won't stop. It won't ever stop. Not until the figurehead is toppled, the creed is humiliated, and the supermen are shown to be cowards, neurotics, pedophiles, insecure men dressing up their weaknesses in power fantasies.

Between all the non-stop coverage, the expressions of grief, the political pandering, no one is stating the obvious. France has been occupied all over again. Once again the occupation has been carried out with the consent of the authorities who have decided that cowardice is the only way. Vichy France has become Vichy Europe, Vichy America, Vichy Australia, where the blatant appeasement is disguised as honor, treason is portrayed as responsible leadership and collaboration in the mass murder of your own people is never acknowledged as such.

It's not Neo-Nazis that are the threat to Jews today. It's the new Nazis and the old Nazis who were rounding up Jews into ghettos and murdering their children long before a thousand years before Hitler. The Neos are pathetically longing for the return of a genocidal state that isn't coming back, while the Muslims are actually working to bring back their genocidal state. They are doing it in Egypt, in Libya, in Pakistan and in England, France and Spain.

Muslims have hated Jews before the telephone, the telegraph, the steam engine, gunpowder, movable type and paper currency. And now surrounded by smartphones, credit cards and jet planes, they still hate them. That simple undeniable fact is denied by government, in every university and in every center of culture. And every one of those deniers has blood on his hands.

Not only the blood of the Jewish children murdered by Mohammed Merah. Not only the blood of Jews murdered by Muslims in France. But the blood of all those who have been killed by Muslim immigrants, no matter of what generation, in the name of Islam.

The names of Chamberlain, Petain and Quisling have become eternally infamous because they stand for appeasement and collaboration. But then what do we make of the names Blair, Sarkozy and Stoltenberg? What have the latter done differently from their predecessors? The left likes to pretend that its collaboration with Islam is moral, while the collaboration with Nazism was immoral. It's a distinction without a difference.

Does it really matter whether the men murdering children in the name of their Fuhrer call him Adolf or Mohammed? Does it matter whether they call themselves Hans or Mohammed? Does it matter whether their fantasies of superiority are based on bad science or bad religion? What matters is the end result. A foreign enemy controls your cities, murders at will and takes your future for his own.

The Tolouse Massacre did not come out of the blue, it follows decades of Muslim violence in France-- a Kristalnacht that has been going on year after year. It will not stop here. Not while there are five million Muslim in France, some of whom are bound to pick up the Koran and take it seriously. The "radical" clerics that Mohammed Merah listened to did not innovate a new religion, there has never been any basis to the teachings of the so-called radicals other than the Koran. The only book more popular in the Muslim world than Mein Kampf.

"O Muslims, O Servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him." That is what Muslims look forward to in their end times. Rocks and trees that tell them where the Jews are so that the fat faithful servants of Allah don't have to spend too much time and energy searching for their victims. Mohammed Merah did not have any trees or rocks to tell him where to find Jews to kill. But he had a compliant French state which tolerated a known Jihadist to the detriment of his victims. 

The question, as always, after every act of Muslim terror is how many more must die? How many? Because the killing will continue. It has gone on for over a thousand years. It is not about to stop now. Muslim leaders who condemn these acts do it for tactical reasons, not moral ones. They don't believe it's wrong to kill rebellious non-Muslims... unless the act rebounds against Muslims.

The difference between the "radicals" and the "moderates" is that the radicals want to engage in genocide even while they are a minority, while the moderates want to wait until they are a majority. The radicals are satisfied with killing a few Hindus, Christians, Jews, here and there. The moderates want to wait and kill millions. Neither are our allies. Both are our murderers.

There is no peaceful way forward here. Carving up Czechoslovakia, Cyprus or Israel will not sate the blood lust of people whose egos are fed by hate, who treat every concession as proof of their own superiority, who love nothing so much as for others to fear them. There is no peace to be had with a creed that defines peace exclusively in terms of its own dominance over others.

Islam, like Nazism, is a disease of the soul, a twin sense of superiority and victimhood possessed by the angry corner dwellers of the world, who are certain that they would rule if only it wasn't for all the others holding them back. To understand a Nazi or a Muslim, you don't need to learn their creeds, just stare into the eyes of a wife beater, a pedophile or any bully and you will see that same smirk which easily transforms into outrage, the arrogant tone that turns unctuous when it is set back on its heels, the flickering eyes that are always looking at what they can't have.

You don't need to read the Koran to understand Mohammed Merah, you can just as easily understand the Koran by reading about what Mohammed Merah did. Nothing much has changed in all the centuries, except that Mohammed Merah didn't get to rape the girl he murdered, because the French state was still functional enough to keep him on the run. The day will however come when it won't be and then the peoples of the free world will learn what true Muslim terror really is, as the peoples of Africa and Asia, as the many other religions of the Middle East, including the Jews learned, in the day of the original Mohammed.

There is nothing extraordinary about what Mohammed Merah did. You may think that there is, but that is because you are a citizen of the free world and you have become used to that rare thing known as civilized behavior. But when your nations opened their borders to people who consider your infidel lands, the Dar Al-Harb, the House of the Sword, then civilization gets its throat cut, it gets chased down at a school, has a gun put to its head and the trigger gets pulled.

Killing children is not a shocking act in the Middle East, except when CNN points its cameras the right way. Parents routinely kill their own children for minor offenses that would hardly get an American child grounded. When they move to America or Canada, they kill their children there too and we considerately look away. If they do that to their children, why do you think they will have any more mercy on yours?

There is no point in holding Mohammed Merah accountable for what he did, just as there was no point in bringing Nazi leaders to trial for crimes against humanity. Mohammed recognizes no form of law other than the law of Islam, just as the Nazis recognized no other form of humanity than their own. There is no common moral or legal system that we share with Islam. Equality before the law, the cornerstone of our system, is so much noise in the windy corridors of the mosque. How can the Subhuman be equal to the Aryan, how can the Infidel be equal to the Muslim?

Mohammed Merah is a mad dog and should be treated as what he is. Accountability is for those who share our moral system. It is for our own leaders who continue perpetuating the macabre myth of a religion of peace, even while attending the funerals of tis victims. Accountability is for the Petains, the Chamberlains and the Quislings who have led us into this hole and keep waving in more Mohammeds to come and join the party.

 

The old Nazis marched in at the head of an army. The new Nazis bought a plane ticket. The old Nazis had to get by the French Armed Forces and the Royal Air Force. The new Nazis are welcomed in and anyone who says a word otherwise faces trials and jail sentences. The old Nazis deported Jews to camps. The new Nazis kill them right in the cities. And the killing will not stop until the Muslim occupation of Europe comes to an end.

 

Disclaimer

E-mail Print PDF

This website is not the official website of ACT! forAmerica, Inc. This website is independently owned and operated by thatACT! for America chapter named on this site.
 The statements, positions, opinions and views expressed in this website, whether written, audible, orvideo, are those of the individuals and organizations making them and
do not necessarily represent the positions, views, and opinions of ACT! for\America, Inc., its directors, officers, or agents.
The sole official website of ACT! for America, Inc. is www.actforamerica.org
Last Updated on Sunday, 21 August 2011 08:02
 

The High Price of Telling the Truth

E-mail Print PDF

The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam

by Eric Allen Bell

Where do I stand on Islam?  Let’s look at its founder – a man who raped a 9 year old girl, a slave owner, a leader who ordered people to be tortured, for adulterers to be stoned, for countless nonbelievers to be beheaded, a killer, a warmonger who spread his “religion of peace” by the sword, a man who suffered from hallucinations of voices telling him to do violent things, a tyrant, a homicidal maniac perhaps the equivalent of 100,000 Osama Bin Ladens.  And this sadistic lunatic is considered to be the “ideal man” in Islam.  What more needs to be said about Islam than that?

So in this climate where innocent people are killed when Korans are burned, when there are riots and bomb threats and killings over cartoons that offend Muslims, when a novelist such as Salman Rushdie is advised by Indian intelligence authorities that it is unsafe for him to enter the country to attend the world’s largest literary festival, when Muslims outside the festival threaten violence such that the festival organizers decide to cancel even patching in a video of Rushdie for the conference, in a world where a man, Theo Van Gough, was shot a couple dozen times in broad daylight, then stabbed, then had a sword rammed into his heart on the sidewalk of a European street simply for making a 10 minute film about the mistreatment of Muslim women – in such a world that is constantly terrorized by Islamic militants whose insanity is co-opted by an army of Liberal bloggers who make excuses for them – who tell us that 911 was probably our fault – what will become of my documentary when I finish it?

How will “Not Welcome” be received?  Will movie theaters refuse to show it, just like those many bookstores who removed the Danish cartoons from their shelves?  Will film festivals be afraid to screen it?  Will my life be in danger?  Will some lunatic Islamic cleric issue a Fatwa ordering my death?  Will CAIR gain even more political influence and work within the system to get it banned as “hate speech”?  Will critics fear for their lives and thus refuse to review it?

Is the Liberal view that Stealth Jihad is just some whacky conspiracy theory really true?  Who will win – free speech of the savagery of a growing mob hell bent on Jihad?  I can only tell you this.  I will not back down.  I will not be bullied, threatened, coerced or terrorized by the “religion of peace”.

We each have a responsibility to the other people on this planet, and especially to those whom we will leave this planet to after we are gone.  And this sometimes means taking an unpopular stand in order to protect the rights of innocent people.  Loonwatch, CAIR and the other numerous terrorist spin control networks – you’ve not seen the end of me.  Not by a long shot.  As the saying goes, “You have a right to swing your fists, but that right ends when your fist connects with my nose”.

And by the way, I still believe that unless they break the law, the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro has a legal right to build their house of worship.  We don’t have to like it, but then again the First Amendment was designed not to protect popular ideas – as they don’t need protecting – but to protect unpopular ideas as well. This is something you won’t find in any Islamic country and it is also something worth protecting  – even when the so-called “religion of peace” tries to shut you down.

Peace,

Eric Allen Bell

Read the whole thing: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/02/07/the-high-price-of-telling-the-truth-about-islam/

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 6

Advertisement

Featured Links: